Comments on the WG-C Draft Report (1/20)

Please offer comments on the final report.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

4 thoughts on “Comments on the WG-C Draft Report (1/20)

  1. I may not have everyone’s full academic spheres assessed, but it appears that the working group lacks voices from at least one of the colleges (Engineering). Does every college/area have representation in this effort?

    1. Not every College has a rep on WG-C. However, the visibility of its work and the bandwidth of its communication channels compensate. There are also several members on the WG from STEM areas including myself.
      CVL

  2. The draft report for Working Group S published over a month ago concluded with a call to “host an Equity and Justice Minor at the Antiracism Center.” Since this call was omitted from this draft report, should we conclude that Working Group C does not endorse hosting any majors/minors at the center?

    1. Although there are exceptions, the creation of a minor usually takes place within a college and sometimes there are complicating factors, e.g., overlap with existing minors. The minor you mention can certainly be contemplated by the proposed center if it comes into existence. However, we did not want to introduce more complicating factors into the center proposal.
      CVL

Comments are closed.